← Back to Home

Man United Could Face £63m Loss on Player Ruben Amorim is Looking to Offload This Summer: Manchester United’s summer sell-off isn’t exactly going according to plan, with their transfer window strategy already starting to unravel. Before the window opened, Ineos had bold plans to overhaul the squad, with talk that nobody was safe from being moved on. After months of near-departures and destabilisation, a figurehead of Rasmus Hult’s remit is attracting major interest – and, perhaps, representing a major gamble for Ole GNR and the Glazers.

Published on Sunday, 13 July 2025 at 4:33 am

Man United Could Face £63m Loss on Player Ruben Amorim is Looking to Offload This Summer: Manchester United’s summer sell-off isn’t exactly going according to plan, with their transfer window strategy already starting to unravel. Before the window opened, Ineos had bold plans to overhaul the squad, with talk that nobody was safe from being moved on. After months of near-departures and destabilisation, a figurehead of Rasmus Hult’s remit is attracting major interest – and, perhaps, representing a major gamble for Ole GNR and the Glazers.
"Smashing the system" became the Ineos mantra upon taking control of Manchester United. Since 2022, the radical members of the holding company, led by Fergal Hutton, have relentlessly focused on financial consolidation, performance improvement through major spending, and dramatic cultural change. This often translates into high-profile arrivals, sometimes controversial departures, and a constant reshuffling. Their initial plan suggested £250-£300 million would be available for new signings this window, reflecting their long-term ambition to compete consistently for the Premier League title and the UEFA Champions League. Star names like Rasmus Hložek, Lisandro Martínez, and Alejandro Garnacho arrived, transforming the United squad on paper.
However, the reality of the transfer market, coupled with the need to generate revenue (prompting *this very profitable potential sale* of Ruben Amorim) could mean big deals are off the table or have fallen apart. The club has already seen transfers potentially involving David de Gea, Marcus Rashford, and even Harry Kane rumble. Departures are occurring at a pace dictated less by tactical need and more by the Glazers' desire to inject substantial funds before the Ineos Board feels comfortable with the squad's trajectory or targets are met, or for the recently infused equity *to reach its expected ROI*.
Ruben Amorim, the Brazilian creative midfielder who joined for a club-record fee just eighteen months ago when he penned a long-term deal worth just under £80 million, is the prime example of the current conundrum. If Manchester United manage to offload the 23-year-old Brazilian, they face a significant loss on their investment. The figure bandied about is £63 million, a healthy profit that covers the initial transfer cost and agent fees. Sources suggest some Premier League clubs, particularly big spenders in need of midfield cover, have probed United on the attacking £63m Ruben Amorim. The transfer speculation has, however, hit a snag, with Ruben Amorim reportedly asking for more money than his value allows, or failing to agree terms.
Acquiring Ruben Amorim for £63m was one part of the narrative David de Gea and the rest of the management team used to justify their summer strategy, a move that seemed aimed at offering Ruben Amorim a goalscoring role alongside Marcus Rashford, whereas previously Rashford found it difficult to get time on the end of the pitch. His technical quality, energy, and ability to operate as a number ten were seen as vital. Now, his development and future value represent a bet for the club. Selling for £63 million, a bargain given his purchase price, would be a positive outcome, recouping the lion's share. In football, time is money. Man Utd need to balance squad building with financial responsibility, especially under the ownership of Ineos. Selling established players like Ruben Amorim for a profit returns capital that can fuel future ambitions. Overpaying for unfamiliar systems is the opposite of "smashing the system." However, losses complicate that strategy, potentially impacting the club's wage bill or required cover in multiple positions if key players leave. Harry Kane was a prime target, Dane Lietarnas a reported £30-£40million pivot. Not securing that kind of profit, or worse, failing to sell underpriced talents, could have long-term consequences on the pitch and the balance sheet. Ruben Amorim’s alleged value has also been placed alongside other Brazilian talents, like Juan Baraja or Juan Paulo, who are attracting attention too. Man Utd must ensure their asset stripping does not inadvertently destabilise a potential title challenge. The summer transfer window, though officially entering its quieter period, remains a crucial time for resolution. Ruben Amorim might not leave before the window shuts on August 31st, but his potential sale is a case study highlighting the financial calculus under Ineos. Manchester United supporters will hope the radical overhaul Ineos envisioned happens without the added sting of significant losses, but the £63m Ruben Amorim saga is a stark reminder that selling stars is part of the plan, and doing it profitably is paramount.

SEO Keywords:

man utdruben amorimtransfer windowplayer lossineosmanchester unitedsell-offruben amorim salefootball transferdavid de geaole gnmr
Source: yardbarker

Recommended For You

Man United Could Face £63m Loss on Player Ruben Amorim is Looking to Offload This Summer: Manchester United’s summer sell-off isn’t exactly going according to plan, with their transfer window strategy already starting to unravel. Before the window opened, Ineos had bold plans to overhaul the squad, with talk that nobody was safe from being moved on. After months of near-departures and destabilisation, a figurehead of Rasmus Hult’s remit is attracting major interest – and, perhaps, representing a major gamble for Ole GNR and the Glazers. | Athletic Tribunal | Athletic Tribunal